Blurred Lines Decision Endorses Traditional Copyright Law

A split decision yesterday by the Ninth Circuit federal appeals court affirmed $5+ million in damages awarded against famous artists Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke in favor of the heirs of Marvin Gaye. A 2015 copyright trial asked a jury if Gaye’s number one hit “Got To Give It Up” was infringed by the 2013 number one hit “Blurred Lines.” They said it did and an appeals panel majority affirmed their decision. The defendants may ask the entire appeals court for a second look.

For now, this high profile decision reaffirms traditional principles of copyright law and how the courts should handle infringement cases. These include [a] appeals courts are “reluctant to reverse jury verdicts in music cases,” [b] the infringement test is “substantial similarity” not exact copying, [c] substantial similarity is shown partly by expert dissection of the musical elements of the work and partly by the subjective reaction of ordinary people to its concept and feel, and [d] appeals courts give “great deference” to jury awards of damages,

Not allowed to hear Gaye’s hit record because of the copyright laws in effect when it was made, the jury infringement verdict came after warring experts’ interpretations of Gaye’s sheet music and the “Blurred Lines” creators’ testimony candidly admitting they were inspired by the older hit.

As technology made copying sound recordings almost effortless, and musical instrument virtuosity often was replaced by software to create sound and manipulate recordings, songs made from scratch became rarer. These changes and internet distribution of music have bred many opponents of US copyright law who see it as out of sync with reality. While new music has always rested on what came before, using other people’s music now seems normal if not an absolute right to many creative people.

The decision will be grist for copyright critics. More warnings have issued in the last 24 hours that creativity will be chilled because “Blurred Lines” did not literally copy “Got To Give It Up” and only captured its musical style or groove. One warning is from yesterday’s dissenting judge.

While mostly on federal procedure, the majority decision pushes back against the critics head-on. It shows how traditional copyright principles are more than adequate to handle infringement claims. And coming from the federal appeals court with the highest number of entertainment industry cases, the decision is a strong signal that it will take legislation to make the copyright laws require more literal copying to prove infringement.

About Craig Pinkus

Craig Pinkus is a partner in the Intellectual Property Group. He also is a member of the Litigation and the Sports, Entertainment and Media Groups. He assists clients with a broad range of disputes and transactions involving all areas of intellectual property, entertainment, and other complex business arrangements. He has conducted trials and arbitrations throughout the United States and has argued appeals before the Seventh, Sixth and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeal, the Indiana appellate courts, and United States Supreme Court.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Blurred Lines Decision Endorses Traditional Copyright Law

  1. William Keating says:

    Any reaction to the House Music Modernization bill? People associated with the digital broadcasters are naturally very anxious to determine who will be setting mechanical and performance rates for the various classes of streamed music under this bill. For example, will the rates for on-demand songs streamed to a single listener be set by the CRB or determined by private negotiations between copyright holder and digital broadcaster?

    Would passage of a bill similar to the House bill by both houses of Congress effectively end the chances of any bill that would compel the terrestrial radio stations to pay performance royalties?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s